![]() |
|
|
Disclaimer The reader accepts, on reading of this disclaimer, that the Internet is a vast wasteland of crap that spews out of human minds. This blog is no different. Any assumptions or conclusions that the reader draws from this blog are not the responsibility of the author, along with any physical or psychological harm that might result from the reading of this blog. Author The author is a paranoid, deranged and cynical misanthrope who records snippets of her life so that she will remember them when she grows old and withered. The identities of any names or initials on this blog are based on the assumptions of the reader unless otherwise specified, and the author claims no responsibility for them. Reality The author somehow got into medical school. Yes, you of the general public, shudder and fear the wrath of an inept doctor. Loves Reading, Maisy (my dog), tea, writing (albeit badly), piano, music, junk food. Hates Almost everything else besides the things mentioned above. Friends Bao Cheng' Bernice' Chien Young' Chun Hing' Claire' Faustina' Felicia' Ferly' Gloria' Irene' Irene & Jiaying' Jac' Jiamin' Jiasin' Jiaying' Lutheng' Karene' Marissa' Melesa' Mingyi' My fictionpress' Pamelia' Pei Rong' Qiu Ting' Rachel' Satires Site' Stasia' Sylvia' The Clique' Vinette' Wenjia' Xin Rong' Xue Ying' Yanne & I' Yanne & Jamie' Zeena' 203' Archives Chat area |
Tuesday, June 04, 2013
Today, another consultant taught me that life is unfair. Or maybe I need to change the definition of 'Terrific presentation' to 'average grades'. Yes yes, let me wallow in my self-pity despite getting a reasonably good mark (25/30). What really pisses me off is that we spent so much effort putting together a presentation that both entertains the audience and facilitates clinical reasoning/change to current guidelines. And in the end, we get worse marks than people putting chunky slides full of data that is not even visible from the other end of the room. And worse marks than people who virtually regurgitated study results and clumsily cut-and-pasted them on a slide. Oh but of course, we had inappropriate pictures. Such as 'bitch' (which is apparently a swear word??? Really? I wouldn't have thought it would be in the same class as 'fuck'), and irrelevant pictures. So despite actually coming up with enough evidence to convince more than 3/4 of our peers that our conclusion to change the recommendations was right, we got a worse mark than people regurgitating shit onto powerpoint slides. Shoot me now. It's frustrating. Are we meant to develop critical thinking, or just play the lottery of getting a lenient marker? Are the people who end up with prizes and honours just lucky instead of really smart? It's honestly bordering on ridiculous the amount of times this has happened to me, and each time with an independent person/multiple people (like today, where peers came up to us after the presentation and told us our presentation was awesome. And how people in the later groups tried to mimic us) saying I/we were treated harshly and unfairly. Maybe I'm just missing something and it's just me. Either way, it doesn't take my annoyance away. I guess the solution to good grades is just student doctor-shopping to find the nicest marker where possible because even baboons hurling pieces of undistilled evidence at certain markers can get better grades than people who actually think through stuff and try to engage the audience. Fuck this shit, bitches. Yes, 3 out of 4 words of that last phrase were swear words. Fuck the entire system. As if I give a shit anymore. 6:43 PM
|